![]() |
Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Edited Legal Collections Data |
Book Title: The Elgar Companion to the Economics of Property Rights
Editor(s): Colombatto, Enrico
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
ISBN (hard cover): 9781840649949
Section: Chapter 12
Section Title: Germline Engineering: Whose Right?
Author(s): Cohen, Lloyd
Number of pages: 23
Extract:
12 Germline engineering: whose right?
Lloyd Cohen*
Introduction
The issue to which I shall direct my attention in this chapter is human
`germline engineering'. This term refers to the coming prospect of changing
the genetic code of human embryos. There are many within the community
of philosophers, scientists, `medical ethicists' and laymen who oppose such
tinkering. I do not; I relish the prospect. If there is some justification in
prohibiting germline engineering it must rest on the evil or harm of the
activity. I make a distinction between evil and harm to allow for the possibil-
ity that some action might fall in the first category (evil) while not falling in
the second (harm), that is, that there is a moral dimension to human action
independent of its effect or intended effect on other human beings. But
because as a lawyer and economist I can offer no special insight into evil, I
shall restrict my inquiry to harm.
My ultimate argument flows from the outcome of the analysis of the
various potential harms alleged to flow from germline engineering. While I
find that there may be minor categories that are problematic, these are no
more than quirky almost bizarre exceptions to the central case, that is,
that germline intervention will yield an enormous improvement in the human
lot. Those exceptional instances in which one could imagine germline inter-
vention resulting in harm to the human condition or prospect neither require
nor justify any significant restraint or prohibition of germline intervention ...
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2004/109.html