New South Wales Bills Explanatory Notes

[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]


FAIR TRADING AMENDMENT (UNFAIR CONTRACT TERMS) BILL 2010

Explanatory Notes

Explanatory note
This explanatory note relates to this Bill as introduced into Parliament.

Overview of Bill


The Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 1) 2010 of the
Commonwealth (along with the Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer
Law) Bill (No. 2) 2010 currently before the Commonwealth Parliament) will insert a
Schedule 2 to the Trade Practices Act 1974 of the Commonwealth setting out the
provisions of the new Australian Consumer Law agreed to by the Council of
Australian Governments.

The objects of this Bill are:


(a) to amend the Fair Trading Act 1987 to enact provisions concerning unfair
contract terms that will eventually form part of the new Australian Consumer
Law when it commences, and

(b) to make consequential amendments to the Contracts Review Act 1980.

Outline of provisions


Clause 1 sets out the name (also called the short title) of the proposed Act.

Clause 2 provides for the commencement of the proposed Act on a day or days to be
appointed by proclamation.


Explanatory note page 2

Fair Trading Amendment (Unfair Contract Terms) Bill 2010
Explanatory note
Schedule 1 Amendment of Fair Trading Act 1987
No 68
Unfair contract term provisions from Australian Consumer Law
Schedule 1 [1] inserts proposed Part 5G in the Fair Trading Act 1987 containing
provisions drawn from the new Australian Consumer Law relating to unfair terms in
consumer contracts that are standard form contracts. A consumer contract is a
contract for the supply of goods or services (or for a sale or grant of an interest in land
in trade or commerce) to an individual whose acquisition of the goods, services or
interest is wholly or predominantly for personal, domestic or household use or
consumption.

The proposed Part contains the following provisions:


(a) Proposed section 60ZC defines certain terms that are used in the proposed
Part.


(b) Proposed section 60ZD provides that an unfair term in a consumer contract
that is a standard form contract is void, although the contract continues to bind
the parties if it is capable of operating without the unfair term. If a contract
claim in relation to a consumer contract containing such an unfair term is
brought before a court or tribunal (such as the Consumer, Trader and Tenancy
Tribunal) having jurisdiction to deal with the claim, the court or tribunal will
be required to treat the term as being void.


(c) Proposed section 60ZE provides that a term is unfair if:

        (i) it would cause a significant imbalance in the parties' rights and
obligations arising under the contract, and
        (ii) it is not reasonably necessary in order to protect the legitimate interests
of the party who would be advantaged by the term, and
        (iii) it would cause detriment (whether financial or otherwise) to a party if it
were to be applied or relied on.


(d) Proposed section 60ZF gives examples of terms that may be unfair.


(e) Proposed section 60ZG makes it clear that a term is not to be treated as being
unfair to the extent that it defines the main subject matter of the contract, sets
an upfront price payable under the contract or is a term required by a
Commonwealth, State or Territory law.


(f) Proposed section 60ZH provides that if a party to proceedings alleges that a
contract is a standard form contract, it is to be presumed to be such a contract
unless another party to the proceedings proves otherwise. The proposed
section also sets out factors that a court or tribunal must take into account in
determining whether a contract is a standard form contract.


(g) Proposed section 60ZI provides for the proposed Part not to apply to certain
kinds of marine contracts or to the constitutions of companies, managed
investment schemes and other bodies.


Explanatory note page 3

Fair Trading Amendment (Unfair Contract Terms) Bill 2010
Explanatory note
Enforcement and remedies in relation to unfair contract terms
Schedule 1 [4] inserts proposed section 64B in the Fair Trading Act 1987 to enable
the Director-General or, with leave, a party to a consumer contract that is a standard
form contract to apply to the Supreme Court for a declaration that a term in contracts
of that kind is unfair.

Schedule 1 [3] amends section 62 of the Fair Trading Act 1987 to make it clear that
a contravention of proposed Part 5G does not constitute an offence. Schedule 1 [2]
amends section 61 of the Act to make it clear a reference in Part 6 of the Act (in which
sections 61 and 62 are located) to a contravention of proposed Part 5G is read as a
reference to a party to a consumer contract applying or relying on a term of the
contract that has been declared to be unfair by the Supreme Court in an application
made under proposed section 64B.

Schedule 1 [5]-[13] amend Part 6 (Enforcement and remedies) of the Fair Trading
Act 1987 to enable the Director-General and certain other persons to obtain certain
other remedies in the event that a party to a consumer contract seeks to apply or rely
on a term of the contract that has been declared to be unfair by the Supreme Court in
an application made under proposed section 64B.

Schedule 1 [14] amends section 86A of the Fair Trading Act 1987 to make it clear
that the Minister or the Director-General may issue public warnings under that
section in relation to business practices involving the use of terms in consumer
contracts that are standard form contracts that are or may be unfair.

Schedule 1 [15] makes an amendment to section 89 of the Fair Trading Act 1987 that
is consequential on the amendments made to the Contracts Review Act 1980 by
Schedule 2.

Savings and transitional provisions
Schedule 1 [16] amends Schedule 5 to the Fair Trading Act 1987 to insert provisions
of a savings or transitional nature consequent on the enactment of the proposed Act.

Schedule 1 [17] amends clause 12 of Schedule 5 to the Fair Trading Act 1987 to
enable the Governor to make regulations of a savings or transitional nature
consequent on the enactment of the proposed Act.

Schedule 2 Consequential amendment of Contracts
Review Act 1980 No 16
Schedule 2 amends the Contracts Review Act 1980 to make it clear that the
provisions of that Act are not limited or restricted by, and do not limit or restrict the
operation of, the provisions of proposed Part 5G of the Fair Trading Act 1987 (as
inserted by Schedule 1 [1]).

Note: If this Bill is not modified, these Explanatory Notes would reflect the Bill as passed in the House. If the Bill has been amended by Committee, these Explanatory Notes may not necessarily reflect the Bill as passed.

 


[Index] [Search] [Download] [Bill] [Help]