(1)  At any stage of proceedings to determine an application for a review of a reviewable decision, the Court may remit the decision to the decision-maker who made it for reconsideration of the decision by the decision-maker.

(2)  If a decision is so remitted to a decision-maker, the decision-maker may reconsider the decision and may –

(a) affirm the decision; or

(b) vary the decision; or

(c) set aside the decision and make a new decision in substitution for the decision set aside.

(3)  If the decision-maker varies the decision –

(a) the application is taken to be an application for review of the decision as varied; and

(b) the person who made the application may either –

(i) proceed with the application for review of the decision as varied; or

(ii) withdraw the application.

(4)  If the decision-maker sets the decision aside and makes a new decision in substitution for the decision set aside –

(a) the application is taken to be an application for review of the new decision; and

(b) the person who made the application may either –

(i) proceed with the application for review of the new decision; or

(ii) withdraw the application.